How Collaboration Improves Technology Integration
Technology delivers better results for nonprofit organizations when it is considered and implemented through an organizational culture of collaboration. This is particularly true for customer relationship management (CRM) platforms and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, which impact a variety of different nonprofit staff and departments and raise unique integration challenges.
Selecting and applying technology based on one person’s or department’s point of view will always be biased towards that person’s perspective and base of knowledge, consequently missing critical information. Multiple people, departments, third party advisers, and technical consultants need to work together to arrive at a consensus of opinion and try to avoid decision-making predominately based on a single person.
Simply put, having a team to compare solutions, explore possibilities, and debate various outcomes will help organizations develop a fuller understanding of new technology and how to put these applications and new information to use. Moreover, it can be liberating for staff to know they can freely explore solutions augmented by technology without bearing the sole responsibility for making the wrong choice without input from others.
The Challenges of Integrating Technology Across Multiple Departments
It may sound like common sense that working collaboratively with colleagues leads to better outcomes. However, improving collaboration is often one of the hardest objectives for organizations to achieve. This is particularly true for nonprofit organizations, where program, development, finance, and leadership teams all depend on shared data but often approach it from very different perspectives.
For example, across the nonprofit sector, data quality and system integration challenges frequently emerge between CRM platforms and ERP systems.
In many organizations, the CRM manages billing and revenue activity and is maintained primarily by the development team, while the finance team relies on the ERP system for financial management, reporting, and compliance. Although data flows between the two systems, alignment in data governance and accountability is often less clear. Finance teams may express limited confidence in data originating in the CRM environment and greater trust in information once it is validated within the ERP. When financial data does not feel operationally “owned” by finance, concerns regarding accuracy, internal controls, and audit readiness can persist.
This pattern reflects a broader structural issue rather than an isolated technology limitation. Technology initiatives frequently emphasize the mechanics of data transfer—how information moves between systems—while devoting less attention to governance frameworks, clearly defined ownership, and cross-functional accountability. Without intentional collaboration between development, finance, and leadership teams, even well-integrated systems can produce friction. Ultimately, technology effectiveness is not determined solely by system capability, but by the clarity of shared responsibility and trust surrounding the data those systems generate and maintain.
Too often, integration projects are treated as purely technical exercises. Data is pushed from a CRM into an ERP (or vice versa) because that’s what the system architecture allows, and what the finance team wants and not because the organization wants to move towards aligning ownership, accuracy, and shared purpose. Consultants, vendors, and even internal teams sometimes miss the opportunity to step back and look at the full data ecosystem.
What is Missing?
The more important questions are rarely asked:
Why does this data need to move between systems?
Which team owns the data at each stage of the process?
How do finance, programs, and leadership collaborate to ensure the data is accurate and meaningful?
Sometimes, there are valid reasons to integrate CRM and ERP systems. A common example is managing revenue deferral. Some CRM platforms are excellent at invoicing and managing revenue deferral. In the case where CRM lacks the revenue management function, bringing invoices into the ERP so finance can manage revenue deferrals and recognition makes complete sense. But even then, success depends less on the technology itself and more on cross-functional agreement around roles, controls, and outcomes to:
Give Purpose to Data
Add Value to Technology
Encourage Access to Information, and
Enhance Collaboration
Technology is a tool — not a solution on its own. When we say that collaboration makes technology better, what we really mean is that technology delivers better results when it is implemented and used within a collaborative culture.
When finance, programs, and leadership work together around shared insights, several key benefits emerge:
Reduced Risk and Greater Data Confidence: Collaboration clarifies data ownership and accountability. When teams jointly agree on where data should live and how it should be validated, the risk of errors, rework, and mistrust is significantly reduced. Finance gains confidence in the numbers, and teams in other departments trust what they see.
Better Use of Financial Insights: Finance leaders can generate accurate reports, but impact only happens when department leaders and executives can access and apply those insights. Modern, cloud-based ERPs supporting dashboards and self-service reporting that allow non-financial users to see the same real-time data finance sees without waiting for static reports.
Reduced Complexity and Lower Integration Costs: When multiple teams manage the same data in different systems, complexity grows quickly and so do costs. Redundant data maintenance, reconciliation efforts, and custom integrations all introduce risk and expense. Collaboration helps organizations agree on where data should live and who owns it, reducing duplication and eliminating unnecessary integrations. The result is a simpler architecture, fewer points of failure, and lower long-term technology and support costs.
A Single Source of Truth: Connected systems for finance, fundraising, and programs will create a shared foundation of data. When everyone operates from the same source of truth, conversations shift from debating numbers to discussing strategy, impact, and next steps.
The benefits of collaboration don’t stop internally. When nonprofits align around shared data and insights, communication with funders, donors, and partners improves as well. Stakeholders gain clearer visibility into financial health, risks, and mission-aligned outcomes, building trust and credibility at a time when transparency matters more than ever.
Planning Tip – Establish a technology application working group that includes a variety of roles and perspectives, such as Board members, staff from different departments, and even outside experts. This approach will help your organization’s use and integration of technology applications to be free of bias and built on a shared foundation of data rather than redundant data transfers born out of inter-departmental distrust. Further, the insights from this group will help ensure that your organization’s integration projects are a strategic investment, not just a technical exercise.
In the end, collaboration does not only make technology better and easier to use, it reduces general human reluctance to adopt and embrace new technology while fostering feelings of comfort based on a shared knowledge that multiple perspectives and safety measures have been considered.
Buu-Linh Tran, CPA is SVP Financial Solutions for JMT Consulting, a firm that helps nonprofit organizations strengthen financial management through purpose-built technology, advisory services, and long-term support, with a focus on improving visibility, simplifying reporting, and enabling better financial decision-making.
You might also be interested in:
Making an Investment in Finance Department Staff Training
The Case for Capitalizing Portable Electronic Devices (PEDs)
